Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuval, Dari
dc.contributor.authorAudoin, Flavie
dc.contributor.authorDalke, Amber
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorAntaya, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorQuintero, José
dc.contributor.authorBlum, Brett
dc.contributor.authorLien, Aaron
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-08T18:54:06Z
dc.date.available2026-01-08T18:54:06Z
dc.date.issued2025-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/679160
dc.description.abstractThis analysis explores the economic considerations of investing in virtual fence (VF) systems, examining their application for representative cow-calf operations under different operating conditions. Virtual fencing (VF) is a tool for livestock management that uses collars and a radio or cellular systems to influence the movement of livestock using auditory and electrical cues (Antaya et al. 2024). Users program the system to establish invisible barriers on a landscape. The system detects the location of animals and if animals approach or cross a “virtual” fence, they receive an auditory or electrical cue encouraging them to move away from the barrier. VF systems have the potential to offset physical fencing costs, enable adoption of adaptive management practices (Boyd et al. 2022; Boyd et al. 2023; Golinski et al. 2023; Verdon et al. 2021), and save ranchers time in locating animals, among other benefits (Campbell et al. 2018; Boyd et al. 2022; Schillings et al. 2024). Commercial VF systems have varying fee structures and require labor to operate which is an additional cost of adoption. Cost and economies of scale are factors that affect livestock producers’willingness to adopt technologies (Pruitt et al. 2012; Lima et al. 2018).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2021-38640-34695 through the Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under project number WPDP22-016. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This work is supported by the AFRI Foundational and Applied Science Program: Inter-Disciplinary Engagement in Animal Systems (IDEAS) [award no. 2022-10726] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Additional funding for the University of Arizona’s Virtual Fence program was provided by Arizona Experiment Station, the Marley Endowment for Sustainable Rangeland Stewardship, and Arizona Cooperative Extension.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Arizona Cooperative Extension Publication AZ2117en_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://extension.arizona.edu/educational-materials
dc.rightsCopyright © Arizona Board of Regents. Licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectvirtual fencingen_US
dc.subjectRange Cattleen_US
dc.subjectrange cattleen_US
dc.subjectRange Beef Cattleen_US
dc.subjectRangeen_US
dc.titleFoundations of Virtual Fencing: Economics of Virtual Fence (VF) Systemsen_US
dc.typetext
dc.typePamphlet
refterms.dateFOA2026-01-08T18:54:08Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
az2117-economics-of-virtual-fe ...
Size:
644.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. Licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. Licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).