• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law
    • Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 42
    • Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 2
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law
    • Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 42
    • Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 2
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Balancing Innovation and Integrity: Australia's AI Ethics and Trust Regulation in Global Context [Article]

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    AJICL_42(2)_Balancing_Innovati ...
    Size:
    1.054Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Rahim, Mia Mahmudur
    Chakraborty, Subrata
    Issue Date
    2025
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    42 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 219 (2025)
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ)
    Journal
    Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law
    Description
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/679299
    Additional Links
    http://arizonajournal.org
    Abstract
    As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in society, ensuring its ethical use and public trust is a global imperative. This paper critically examines Australia’s approach to regulating AI ethics and trust, comparing it with frameworks in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. While these jurisdictions adopt varied strategies—ranging from risk-based and sector-specific to principle-driven models—Australia relies primarily on voluntary standards, such as the AI Ethics Principles and the Voluntary AI Safety Standard. Despite their intent, these frameworks lack enforceability, leading to inconsistent adoption and limited accountability. The paper highlights key ethical challenges, including privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and the absence of legal safeguards in high-risk AI applications. It argues that Australia’s current regulatory landscape is insufficient to address the rapid evolution of AI technologies. To bridge this gap, the authors propose a meta-regulation approach—one that integrates legal oversight with organizational self-regulation, fostering both innovation and ethical responsibility. This model offers a flexible yet accountable framework for embedding ethical principles into AI development and deployment. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for Australia to adopt a more robust, enforceable, and adaptive regulatory strategy to ensure trustworthy AI.
    Type
    Article
    text
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0743-6963
    Collections
    Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 2

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.