Honey Mesquite Water Relations and Gas Exchange Following Herbicide-Induced Morphological Change

Abstract

Honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.) may maintain apical dominance after a treatment that causes partial top-kill (PTK) and leaves canopies with “stem flagging.” In contrast, top-killing treatments stimulate multistemmed regrowth (i.e., basal sprouting; BSP). Because this difference may impact competition with grasses, a better understanding of physiology associated with PTK and BSP canopies compared with untreated canopies is needed. We quantified predawn leaf water potential (Ψ<inf>PD</inf>), leaf-level gas exchange rates (photosynthesis [A] and stomatal conductance [g<inf>s</inf>]), and whole-tree stomatal conductance (G<inf>s</inf>) of untreated, PTK, and BSP mesquites 2−11 yr after aerial herbicide application in a north Texas savanna. Total leaf area was nearly 4 × greater in untreated and BSP compared with PTK trees. In a few situations where soil moisture stress was greatest, untreated mesquites exhibited more negative Ψ<inf>PD</inf> and lower leaf-level gas exchange than did PTK mesquites. BSP mesquites occasionally had greater Ψ<inf>PD</inf> and leaf-level gas exchange than untreated mesquites. Since imbalances in root-to-shoot ratios caused by PTK were largely not manifested at the leaf-physiology level, PTK mesquites likely adjusted rapidly to herbicide disturbance. When g<inf>s</inf> was scaled to the whole canopy, G<inf>s</inf> estimates were 3–4 × greater in untreated and BSP than PTK trees. Thus, canopy leaf area was the primary driver of differences in whole-canopy G<inf>s</inf>. It is LIKELY that transpiration would be lower in a stand of untreated mesquites compared with PTK mesquites of similar stand density and basal areas before treatment, as results from comparing untreated and PTK mesquites indicate. Partially top-killed trees that maintain apical dominance and do not resprout should compete less with grasses for water and light and facilitate species diversity and heterogeneity. © 2020 The Society for Range Management