Response of Planted Sagebrush Seedlings to Cattle Grazing Applied to Decrease Fire Probability
Issue Date
2020-09Keywords
Artemisia tridentataFuel management
Fuel reduction
Sagebrush restoration
Shrub recovery
Transplanting
cattle
fire management
grazing management
habitat restoration
human activity
palatability
plantation forestry
restoration ecology
seedling establishment
shrub
wildfire
woody plant
United States
Wyoming
Artemisia tridentata
Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis
Bos
Coleoptera
Poaceae
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Kirk W. Davies, Jon D. Bates, and Chad S. Boyd "Response of Planted Sagebrush Seedlings to Cattle Grazing Applied to Decrease Fire Probability,," Rangeland Ecology and Management 73(5), 629-635, (3 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.05.002Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology and ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Restoration of non-sprouting shrubs after wildfire is increasingly becoming a management priority. In the western U.S., Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle & Young) restoration is a high priority, but sagebrush establishment from seed is sporadic. In contrast, planting seedlings often successfully restores sagebrush, but is expensive and time consuming. After planting, hence, there is a need to protect the investment from disturbances such as fire that will erase gains in sagebrush recovery. Grazing is likely the only tool that can be applied feasibly across the landscape to decrease wildfire probability, but there are concerns that grazing and associated activities (e.g. trampling) may negatively impact sagebrush seedlings. We investigated effects of grazing by cattle, applied as a fine fuel management strategy, on planted sagebrush seedlings at five blocks for five years. Grazing substantial reduced exotic annual grasses, large perennial bunchgrasses, and total herbaceous cover, thus achieving fuel management goals. Sagebrush cover and reproductive efforts were almost 2-fold greater in grazed compared to non-grazed areas in the final year of the study. This suggests that grazing favored sagebrush, a generally unpalatable shrub, recovery, likely by reducing competition from highly palatable herbaceous vegetation. Density of sagebrush, however, was similar between grazed and non-grazed areas. This research demonstrates that grazing can be strategically applied to reduce the probability of wildfire in areas with planted sagebrush seedlings; thereby, protecting the investment in sagebrush recovery. With more refinement, it also appears that grazing can be utilized to accelerate the recovery of sagebrush and potentially other woody vegetation habitat by modifying the competitive relationship between herbaceous and woody vegetation. © 2020Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2020.05.002
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

