Breeding Bird Use of Production Stands of Native Grasses—a Working Lands Conservation Approach
Issue Date
2020-11Keywords
Biofuelsbreeding birds
Conservation Reserve Program
grazing
hay production
relative abundance
agricultural production
biofuel
breeding population
conservation management
energy crop
forage
forest cover
forested catchment
native species
passerine
stand structure
Kentucky
Tennessee
United States
Agelaius
Agelaius phoeniceus
Ammodramus savannarum
Colinus virginianus
Poaceae
Spizella pusilla
Sturnella magna
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Patrick D. Keyser, Andrew S. West, David A. Buehler, Christopher M. Lituma, John J. Morgan, and Roger D. Applegate "Breeding Bird Use of Production Stands of Native Grasses—a Working Lands Conservation Approach," Rangeland Ecology and Management 73(6), 827-837, (20 November 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.04.005Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology and ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Grassland birds have experienced protracted population declines, primarily due to loss and degradation of native grasslands. Restoration of native grasses may benefit grassland birds, but such restoration within the eastern United States has been limited. Production uses of native grasses (e.g., hay, pasture, biofuel feedstock) provide market-based incentives that could lead to more extensive use of these grasses than existing conservation-focused practices, potentially influencing breeding birds. Therefore, we compared breeding bird (n = 9 target species) relative abundance among 4 types of native warm-season grass (NWSG) agricultural production fields: forage (hay and pasture; n = 22 and 7, respectively), seed (n = 21), biofuel (n = 15), and a control (idle fields in conservation programs or practices; n = 37) in Kentucky and Tennessee, 2009–2010. We detected 2 145 birds, with field sparrow (Spizella pusilla, 43%) and red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus, 27%) encountered most often. Relative abundance did not differ between production types and controls except for field sparrow (lower on seed production fields) and northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus, lower on hay production fields). Species richness equaled or exceeded that of control fields for all production categories. We documented negative relationships between relative abundance and landscape-scale forest cover for four species (field sparrow, grasshopper sparrow [Ammodramus savannarum], eastern meadowlark [Sturnella magna], and red-winged blackbird) and positive relationships with amount of pasture and hay cover for four species (northern bobwhite, grasshopper sparrow, eastern meadowlark, and red-winged blackbird), reinforcing the importance of nonforested environments for these species. We conclude that production stands could be a viable approach for increasing NWSG available for breeding birds and, when established in the appropriate landscape context, can provide benefits similar to those provided by conservation programs. © 2020 The Society for Range ManagementType
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2020.04.005
