Weed-Suppressive Bacteria Applied as a Spray or Seed Mixture Did Not Control Bromus tectorum
Issue Date
2020-11Keywords
bioherbicidebiomass
cheatgrass
cover
density
downy brome
aboveground biomass
bacterium
detection method
grass
relative abundance
spray
weed control
Bromus tectorum
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
David A. Pyke, Scott E. Shaff, Michael A. Gregg, and Julie L. Conley "Weed-Suppressive Bacteria Applied as a Spray or Seed Mixture Did Not Control Bromus tectorum," Rangeland Ecology and Management 73(6), 749-752, (20 November 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.11.001Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology and ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
We conducted two case studies testing effectiveness of a soil-borne bacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens strain D7, in controlling Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) when mixed with native seeds sown after a fire and when sprayed on a native community with high abundances of B. tectorum. Each case study area (162 ha) compared treatments with D7 present and absent and was replicated four times (20.3 ha each) in a completely randomized design. Response variables (foliar cover, aboveground biomass, and density of B. tectorum; density of sown native plants) were measured pretreatment for the sprayed area and each year for 3 yr after treatment at both study areas and were evaluated as a repeated measures analysis. Foliar cover, biomass, and density of B. tectorum with sprayed or seed mixture applications did not differ between D7-treated and untreated areas at any time within the study (F<inf>1,6</inf> ≤ 1.42; P ≥ 0.28). D7 as a seed mixture did not significantly impact densities of native seedlings (F<inf>1,6</inf> = 1.27; P = 0.30) at any time during the study. Results contrasted with previous D7 studies that showed effective control of B. tectorum within 3 yr of treatment. Since bioherbicidal methods are being commonly applied, we believe that reporting negative results is important for future meta-analytical studies that provide managers with information on the likelihood for weed-suppressive bacteria to effectively control weeds. © 2019Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2019.11.001
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management.

