Fall Water Effects on Growing Season Soil Water Content and Plant Productivity
Issue Date
2020-03Keywords
ANPPautumn
drought
precipitation
rangeland
semiarid grassland
autumn
climate change
drought
functional group
grass
grassland
growing season
irrigation system
net primary production
precipitation (climatology)
rangeland
semiarid region
soil water
Poaceae
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Lance T. Vermeire and Matthew J. Rinella "Fall Water Effects on Growing Season Soil Water Content and Plant Productivity," Rangeland Ecology and Management 73(2), 252-258, (11 March 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.11.006Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology and ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Understanding fall precipitation effects on rangelands could improve forage production forecasting and inform predictions of potential climate change effects. We used a rainout shelter and water addition to test effects of seasonal precipitation on soil water and annual net primary production of C<inf>3</inf> perennial grass, C<inf>4</inf> perennial grass, annual grasses, forbs, and all plants combined. Treatments were 1) drought during September−October and April−May (DD); 2) drought plus irrigation during September−October and drought during April−May (WD); 3) year-long ambient conditions (WW); and 4) ambient plus irrigation during September−October (W + W). Treatments created conditions ranking among the driest and wettest September−October periods since 1937. Fall water effects on soil water were not detectable by May at 15 cm and 30 cm. Effects persisted into July at 60 cm and 90 cm, depths below the primary root zone. With spring drought, annual net primary production was 344 kg ha−1 greater when the previous fall was wet rather than dry. No differences were detected between fall water treatments when spring was wet and fall was about 184% (1 938 ± 117 kg ha−1) or 391% of the median (1 903 ± 117 kg ha−1). Fall water increased C<inf>3</inf> perennial grass when spring was also wet and had no effect under spring drought, when forage production concerns are greatest. Fall water did not affect C<inf>4</inf> perennial grass, and extremely wet fall conditions reduced forb production about 50%. The greatest effect of fall water was increased annual grass production. Even record high levels of fall water had minor effects on biomass, functional group composition, and soil water that were short-lived and overwhelmed by the influence of spring precipitation. Movement of fall water to deep soil by the growing season suggests plants that would most benefit from fall precipitation are those that could use it during fall (winter annuals), or deep-rooted species (shrubs). © 2019Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2019.11.006
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management.

