Why has the adoption of rotational grazing declined in parts of the United States?
Issue Date
2023-10Keywords
Rotational grazingSmall and medium-sized farms
Sustainable grasslands management
adoption behavior
cattle
grassland
grazing
grazing management
sustainability
Midwest
United States
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Jeffrey K. O'Hara, Julian Reyes, Lynn G. Knight, and Joel Brown "Why Has the Adoption of Rotational Grazing Declined in Parts of the United States?," Rangelands 45(5), 92-101, (20 October 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2023.06.003Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
RangelandsAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
• Conservation policies promote sustainable grasslands management practices, like rotational or management-intensive (RMI) grazing, in the United States. • The self-reported adoption of RMI grazing declined in the United States between 2007 and 2017, and few studies have investigated this trend. • We use panel data to estimate county-level fixed effects regressions to assess if changes in the size of cattle operations are influencing this trend. We estimate a regression for the United States, as well as regressions by Climate Hub region. • We find nationally, as well as within six of the eight Climate Hub regions, an increase in cattle operations with <20 head leads to a smaller increase in RMI grazing relative to an increase in cattle operations with 20-199 head. However, this effect is reversed in the Northeast. • Nationally, we find similar effects on RMI grazing among cattle operations with 20-199 head and ≥200 head. Still, in two of the Climate Hub regions (Midwest and Southeast), cattle operations with 20-199 head lead to greater RMI grazing adoption than cattle operations with ≥200 head. Thus, declines in RMI grazing are most strongly associated with declines in small and medium-sized cattle operations. © 2023Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0190-0528ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rala.2023.06.003
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).-

