The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElshikha, Diaa Eldin
dc.contributor.authorAttalah, Said
dc.contributor.authorThorp, Kelly R.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dong
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Clinton
dc.contributor.authorElsadek, Elsayed Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-03T19:06:37Z
dc.date.available2026-04-03T19:06:37Z
dc.date.issued2026-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/679933
dc.description.abstractThe irrigation management tools reviewed in this publication serve different but interrelated purposes. The WINDS model functions as a field-scale model for evaluating soil water, salinity, and related processes, while the pyfao56 model is a FAO-56 evapotranspiration and soil-water-balance analysis model designed for customized integration within other software platforms and user interfaces. The OpenET platform provides satellite-derived evapotranspiration data rather than direct management recommendations, and CropManage focuses on crop-specific irrigation and nitrogen management. SWAN Systems is designed as a farm-scale platform that integrates irrigation and nutrient management Because these tools are intended for different applications, selection should be guided by the required management level and objectives. Platforms such as SWAN Systems and CropManage are better suited for operational irrigation scheduling, particularly when sensor data or crop-specific recommendations are desired. The current version of WINDS is more appropriate for scenario analysis and salinity management, while OpenET is useful for accessing regional or field-scale ET information. In practice, using more than one tool may provide the most effective support, especially when irrigation scheduling, evapotranspiration estimation, salinity management, and automation are all part of the management strategy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Arizona Cooperative Extension Publication AZ2192en_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://extension.arizona.edu/educational-materials
dc.rightsCopyright © Arizona Board of Regents. Licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectirrigationen_US
dc.titleComputer Models and Decision-Support Platforms for Precision Irrigation Managementen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typePamphleten_US
refterms.dateFOA2026-04-03T19:06:38Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
az2192-computer-models-decisio ...
Size:
1.028Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. Licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. Licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).